The Ultimate Guide to Earning Enrich Platinum Status in 2026
- Jun 7
- 17 min read
For years, the playbook was fairly straightforward. Fly enough Malaysia Airlines and Oneworld flights, accumulate 100 Elite Points, and you would secure Enrich Platinum status, which also translates into Oneworld Emerald. For Malaysian-based travellers, this was one of the most accessible ways to obtain top-tier Oneworld status without needing to subject yourself to the increasingly brutal requirements imposed by programs like British Airways Club, Qantas, or Cathay.
That era is now over.
On the surface, this looks like a straightforward devaluation. In reality, the structure is more intelligent than that.
The Platinum threshold increases by 40%, but Enrich also increases Elite Point earning on longer flights and premium cabins. Short-haul status grinding becomes less attractive, while longer routes, Business Class and Business Suite become more rewarding.
I think this is the correct direction. Flying purely for the sake of earning Elite Points remains one of the stupidest things in the world, especially with the kind of hard products you receive on Malaysia Airlines.
If you are spending real money, taking annual leave, booking flights, dealing with airports and flying back and forth purely to increase your Elite Points balance, you need to be honest about what you are actually buying.
The incremental value of Enrich Platinum over Enrich Gold is not a magical transformation of your travel life. The real prize is Oneworld Emerald, and more specifically, access to First Class lounges when flying airlines that actually operate First Class lounges worth visiting, such as Cathay Pacific and Japan Airlines.
If your travel pattern does not involve Oneworld carriers with strong First Class ground experiences, the incremental value becomes less dramatic.
Many benefits people associate with status, such as Business Class lounge access, priority check-in, priority boarding, extra baggage and a smoother airport journey, are already available when redeeming miles for Business Class.
So unless you are using Enrich Platinum to unlock premium Oneworld Emerald experiences you would not otherwise receive, chasing status for the sake of status quickly becomes less of a strategy and more of an expensive personality disorder.
Enrich Platinum should only be pursued if the trips themselves make sense. The destinations should be places you actually want to visit. The airfare should be sensible. The credit card used to pay for the trip should be intentional. The lounge experience should add comfort to the journey. Elite Points should be a byproduct of intelligent travel planning, not the sole reason you board the plane.
What Changed in Enrich 2026?
The full 2026 structure and benefits are as follows:
The increase is not evenly distributed. Silver and Gold move up modestly. Platinum moves up aggressively. That tells us the strategy. Malaysia Airlines is not making basic elite status impossible. It is restoring scarcity at the top of the program.
Anyone who visits the Malaysia Airlines Golden Lounge at KLIA during peak hours understands the rationale. The lounges are crowded, the Platinum Lounge no longer feels meaningfully exclusive, and the elite experience feels diluted.
A frequent flyer program cannot keep expanding the number of top-tier members while pretending the benefits remain premium. The 2026 structure is a reset.
The revised Elite Points table softens the blow for travellers on longer routes and premium cabins, and the program now rewards quality of flying more clearly than quantity of flying and hence, Enrich, as a loyalty program, is becoming more rational. Malaysia Airlines, as an airline however, remains a different conversation altogether.
That duality continues to define the entire Enrich story.
Why Enrich Platinum Still Matters
Before looking at the data, we need to answer the obvious question: Is Enrich Platinum still worth chasing? For casual travellers, probably not.
If you fly two or three times a year, mostly within ASEAN, and rarely touch Oneworld airlines outside Malaysia Airlines, spending tens of thousands of Ringgit to chase Platinum makes little sense.
For frequent travellers that fly on Oneworld airlines such as British Airways, Cathay Pacific, Qatar Airways, and so on, Enrich Platinum remains valuable because it gives you Oneworld Emerald, and that is where the real value sits.
Think Cathay Pacific First Class lounges in Hong Kong, Qantas First Lounge access in Singapore, Japan Airlines premium lounges in Tokyo, British Airways The First priority check-in, extra baggage, priority boarding and smoother airport handling across the Oneworld network.
These benefits reduce friction. They save time. They improve the journey. The irony is that Oneworld Emerald is often more valuable outside Malaysia Airlines than on Malaysia Airlines itself, much to the dismay of hardcore Malaysia Airlines' loyalists', although frequent travellers on Oneworld airlines will know this to be the case.
The Cathay Pacific lounge ecosystem in Hong Kong sits in a different universe from Malaysia Airlines’ Golden Lounges. The Pier First Class Lounge remains one of the best lounges I have visited. The newly refurbished Wing still has character (although access to Emeralds are still pending). The Bridge gives Hong Kong transits a different level of comfort since reopening.
Bottom line, Malaysia Airlines may get you the status, Oneworld partners remind you why you want the status.
The AmBank Enrich Visa Platinum Bypass
I'll jump straight to the point since this topic has been discussed multiple times. Both the AmBank Enrich Visa Infinite and AmBank Enrich Visa Platinum offer a 30% reduction in Elite Points requirement for the principal cardholder. This is not a bonus point earning mechanic. This is not a spend-based status accelerator. This is a direct reduction of the status requirement itself.
For 2026 Elite Points earning, the new thresholds with the AmBank reduction are:
Instead of needing 140 Elite Points for Platinum, an eligible AmBank Enrich Visa principal cardholder only needs 98 Elite Points. That is a difference of 42 Elite Points.
However, this is where I need to be extremely clear. You should NOT obtain the AmBank Enrich Visa Infinite as an Enrich miles accumulation card, or rather, spend using it at all. I have written repeatedly that the AmBank Enrich Visa Infinite has moved closer and closer toward irrelevance as a serious miles-earning product.
If you are getting an AmBank Enrich card purely for the 30% Elite Points reduction, the logical move is to consider the AmBank Enrich Visa Platinum, which is free-for-life and still provides the same 30% reduction in Elite Points requirement for the principal cardholder.
Understanding the 2026 Elite Points Table
Enrich Elite Points are calculated based on two factors:
Zone, based on flight distance
Cabin class of travel
The 2026 Elite Points table for Malaysia Airlines and Oneworld member airlines is as follows:
The earning gap between Zone 2, Zone 3 and Zone 4 now matters significantly, and is why Zone 3 and Zone 4 routes become central to the 2026 strategy.
A return Economy Class flight to Bangkok earns 4 Elite Points.
A return Economy Class flight to Bali (Denpasar) earns 8 Elite Points.
A return Economy Class flight to Delhi, Seoul, Osaka, Tokyo or Perth earns 12 Elite Points.
Zone 3 offers attractive short-to-medium haul arbitrage when fares are low. Zone 4 offers stronger point density without requiring Europe-level travel time or cost.
The biggest execution risk is fare eligibility. If the booking class does not earn Enrich Points, it does not earn Elite Points. Malaysia Airlines uses multiple fare families, promotional fares, upgrade mechanics and booking classes. A cheap ticket is useless for status if the underlying booking class is ineligible.
This is especially important when booking through OTAs or promotional sales where fare classes may not be clearly displayed before payment.
The upgrade rule also matters. Successful paid upgrades or points upgrades can earn Elite Points based on the upgraded cabin. For example, an Economy ticket to Tokyo that successfully upgrades to Business Class can earn Business Class Elite Points. However, free upgrades obviously do not award additional Elite Points.
On Firefly
A quick note on Firefly flights. As I draw up this framework, I did notice that intra-Borneo Firefly flights were unavailable across several months. It's indeed possible that Firefly has suspended these flights and appears to be a casualty of MAG's recent network optimizations and the ongoing transition of MASwings into the state-owned AirBorneo.
As such, this guide will completely omit all Firefly-related optimizations (a shame, as a KCH-BKI was a great route for Elite Points).
The Refined Points CPEP Framework
CPEP means Cost Per Elite Point.
The formula is simple for my existing 2025 version:
CPEP = Return airfare divided by return Elite Points
This article starts with airfare-only CPEP. A pure airfare baseline tells us which routes are structurally efficient for Elite Points. It does not tell us whether the total trip is cheap, as that comes later in the second layer of this article where I'll be introducing a new, 2026 hotel-adjusted CPEP framework.
The 2026 Airfare-Only CPEP Matrix: Economy Class
The following Economy Class analysis uses average return fares across five travel seasons.
The Economy Class matrix produces one very clear conclusion: the best airfare-only CPEP opportunities are not necessarily found on the shortest routes, but on routes where the fare remains unusually low relative to the Elite Points awarded.
East Malaysia stands out immediately, with Kuching, Sibu, and Bintulu sitting at just RM123 per Elite Point, making them the strongest Economy Class status-run options in the entire matrix. Shenzhen is also surprisingly attractive at RM138 per Elite Point, proving that selected regional international routes can outperform even domestic sectors when the fare sits at the right price point.
The real traps are the short international routes. Singapore, Medan, and Phuket look convenient on paper, but their Zone 1 treatment makes them terrible from a CPEP perspective, with Phuket reaching a painful RM550 per Elite Point.
More interestingly, long-haul Economy can be far more rational than many short-haul options. Paris and London come in at RM215 and RM235 per Elite Point respectively, while Melbourne is exceptionally strong at RM194. Flying 13 hours on Malaysia Airlines metal however may not really be what you wanna do!
In other words, the 2026 structure quietly rewards longer Economy flights where fares remain competitive, while punishing expensive short sectors that earn too few Elite Points.
The 2026 Airfare-Only CPEP Matrix: Business Class
Business Class changes the equation because the Elite Point multiplier increases sharply.
The following Business Class analysis uses average return fares across five travel seasons.
Business Class is where the analysis becomes more nuanced. While the higher Elite Points multiplier helps, it does not automatically make Business Class the better status-run strategy because the fare premium often rises faster than the Elite Points awarded.
The strongest Business Class sweet spot is Amritsar at RM225 per Elite Point, followed closely by selected East Malaysia routes such as Kota Kinabalu, Labuan, Sandakan, and Tawau at RM244. These routes are far more compelling than many “sexier” long-haul options, especially when the objective is purely to buy Elite Points efficiently.
But let's be honest, which one of you is going to fly to Amritsar for a holiday or even for work on a regular basis? That alone makes this worth excluding as part of the strategy.
The most interesting arbitrage sits in the cross-cabin comparison. For almost every route, Economy Class has the lower CPEP, meaning it is cheaper to earn Elite Points in Economy than Business.
However, Bangkok and Mumbai are the two notable exceptions: Business Class to Bangkok comes in at RM313 vs RM325 in Economy, while Business Class to Mumbai comes in at RM270 vs RM292 in Economy. Chengdu is effectively neutral at RM325 in both cabins.
This is exactly why CPEP matters: it exposes where Business Class is not just more comfortable, but mathematically more efficient. On the other end, the Suite-style fares are clearly poor status-run tools, with Tokyo Suite and London Suite pricing pushing the CPEP far above the standard Business Class baseline. Those should be treated as product-experience purchases, not rational Elite Point acquisition strategies.
The Science of Upgrading from Business to Business Suite
Buying Business Suite outright is generally poor status-run logic (or just poor logic at all honestly), as the fare premium is simply too high relative to the additional Elite Points earned. However, upgrading from Business Class to Business Suite can completely change the maths.
Based on my stalking around Malaysia Airlines-related Facebook groups, a Business-to-Business Suite upgrade on London has been successfully secured at around GBP250 one-way, while other visible datapoints suggest buy-now or bid ranges around the RM1,300 to RM1,500 level per sector.
At that price, the incremental CPEP for London falls to roughly RM270 to RM290 per additional Elite Point, bringing the all-in upgraded return CPEP to around RM520 per Elite Point. That is even better than the standard Business Class baseline in my matrix.
Paris follows the same logic. Using a visible Business Suite bid range of EUR230 to EUR358, a midpoint upgrade cost would produce an incremental CPEP of roughly RM276 per additional Elite Point, bringing the all-in upgraded return CPEP to just under RM500 per Elite Point.
As for Tokyo, I'd outright tell you to skip this completely and just use the additional money to pick a flight with the new A330-900neo aircraft (which is generally costlier) anyway over the A350 Business Suite.
As such, while Business Suite is not worth buying outright for status purposes, it can be worth upgrading into opportunistically, but only on Zone 6 routes like London and Paris.
The New Hotel-Adjusted CPEP Framework
Before diving into the numbers, a quick note on methodology.
Hotel prices in this framework are all sourced from Trip.com and have been deliberately inflated by 20% above my research baseline, and if you find lower rates during your own search, your CPEP will simply be better than what's shown here, so there is no reason to second-guess the analysis.
For every city, I applied consistent filters: hotels only, 4-star rating, and a guest excellence score of 9.0 or above. The nightly rate used is the average of the highest and lowest qualifying properties after filtering, with outliers removed where a single property sat significantly above or below the next comparable option.
I have also excluded Zone 1, Zone 5, and Zone 6 destinations from this section entirely. Zone 5 and Zone 6 routes are genuine long-haul holidays and treating them as status runs would be intellectually dishonest. Zone 1 routes are simply too Elite Point-inefficient to warrant the analysis.
On the flip side, it's also easier to justify to your wife that you're going on several holidays per year rather than spending hard-earned money flighting back and forth for the sole purpose of earning Elite Points.
I may or may not be speaking from experience here!
New Economy Class CPEP Framework
Shenzhen takes the top position at RM263 per Elite Point, displacing Kuching as the single most efficient Economy Class option when all-in costs are considered. The driver is straightforward: Shenzhen earns Zone 3 Elite Points (8 per return trip) while maintaining both a low fare and modest 4-star hotel rates, which is a combination no other Zone 3 destination in this matrix replicates.
Kuching falls to second at RM280, with Sibu close behind at RM285. These East Malaysia routes remain structurally efficient, but the narrowing gap between them and selected Zone 3 and Zone 4 destinations is the important development in the new framework.
Within Zone 2, hotel costs introduce meaningful divergence that the fare-only matrix had flattened. Bintulu, Miri, and Tawau, which clustered near the top of the old-CPEP table, slip to RM323 and RM338 respectively once accommodation is factored in.
Kota Kinabalu drops to RM401, a material fall from its fare-only CPEP of RM151, driven by the premium commanded by branded 4-star hotels in KK relative to Sarawak's interior cities. Sandakan follows at RM405. These routes remain viable Economy options, but the previously wide efficiency gap over further-afield destinations has closed considerably once you're paying market rates for three nights.
The more instructive data points sit at the intersection of efficiency and destination desirability. Amritsar (RM283) is the single best Zone 4 Economy option in the entire matrix, followed by Ahmedabad (RM333), both benefiting from India's affordable branded hotel market.
Denpasar (RM298) and Changsha (RM300) round out the top tier for different reasons. Changsha keeps costs low, while Bali earns its position through the combination of a competitive fare, a manageable 4-star hotel rate, and the distinct advantage of being somewhere most people would actively choose to spend three nights. That last quality carries more weight in practice than any number will tell you.
New Business Class CPEP Framework
Business Class interacts with the hotel-adjusted framework differently from Economy, and the structural reason is worth spelling out.
Hotel costs are identical regardless of which cabin you sit in, but Business Class earns a higher Elite Points multiplier on the same route. That means the per-Elite-Point cost of accommodation is always lower in Business than in Economy, and the same hotel budget does proportionally less damage to your CPEP. I've kept hotel prices identical across both cabin analyses to ensure a clean comparison.
When fares are competitive and hotels are modest, this efficiency advantage compounds. When hotels are expensive, it can still rescue the Business Class CPEP from looking like a pure premium.
Amritsar (RM275) retains the top Business Class position. Tawau (RM319) and Ahmedabad (RM335) follow, with Kuching (RM341) and Denpasar (RM342) sitting close together immediately behind.
Mumbai (RM380) and Delhi (RM385) emerge as the strongest Zone 4 Business performers, benefiting from both competitive MH fares into India and the comparatively affordable branded hotel market in Indian cities.
Shanghai (RM410) and Beijing (RM430) round out a coherent Zone 4 cluster that holds up well on both metrics, great for fans and lovers of Greater China or businessmen making regular business trips to the mainland.
The bottom of the Business table confirms what the fares alone already suggested. Hong Kong (RM783) and Guangzhou (RM767) are the worst-performing Business Class CPEPs in the Zones 2–4 analysis, which is the result of expensive fares compounded by punishing hotel markets.
Tokyo Business (RM630), Osaka (RM610), and Perth (RM625) are poor status-acquisition options regardless of how appealing the destination itself may be, and even Seoul (RM515) sits in an uncomfortable middle position.
Summary of New CPEP Findings
The old CPEP analysis flagged two routes where flying Business Class was more efficient than Economy: Bangkok and Mumbai. Add hotel costs into the equation and that number jumps to 17.
Bangkok is the headline. Business Class comes in at RM500 per Elite Point versus RM700 in Economy. That RM200 gap in Business Class's favour is arguably the most counterintuitive finding in this entire piece. The same dynamic plays out across a long list of popular destinations: Labuan (RM431 Business vs RM550 Economy), Phnom Penh (RM487 vs RM588), Jakarta (RM495 vs RM590), Ho Chi Minh (RM525 vs RM588), Mumbai (RM380 vs RM475), and Chiang Mai (RM493.75 vs RM550), among others.
The reason is simple: when 4-star hotels in a city are expensive, the Business Class Elite Points multiplier more than absorbs the higher fare. On these routes, defaulting to Economy isn't being frugal. It's paying more per Elite Point for fewer of them.
Now for the uncomfortable part. Scroll to the top of both CPEP tables and you'll notice a pattern. Amritsar, Ahmedabad, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Thiruvananthapuram, Changsha. These cities consistently outperform because India and second-tier Chinese cities combine competitive fares with genuinely affordable 4-star hotel markets.
But here's the thing, Amritsar's could be attractive as a holiday destination for some people, and India's major cities reward the traveller who gives them a proper chance, but for most Malaysian frequent flyers, these destinations sit firmly at the bottom of the travel wish list regardless of what the numbers say.
The Overall Route Strategy for 2026
Combining the fare-only and hotel-adjusted data across both cabins, a few conclusions are hard to argue with.
For Business Class, Zone 4 is where the strategy sits. 20 Elite Points per return trip means hotel costs are spread across a much larger base, and the Zone 4 shortlist of Amritsar, Ahmedabad, Mumbai, Delhi, Shanghai, and Beijing holds up well across both frameworks.
Mumbai at RM380 and Delhi at RM385 are the standout picks: competitive fares, affordable hotel markets, and 20 Elite Points per trip. For readers making regular trips to China for work, Shanghai (RM410) and Beijing (RM430) offer solid Zone 4 efficiency as well.
For Economy, the top tier is a short list. Kuching at RM281 hotel-adjusted is the anchor pick. It earns efficiently, the fare is low, and Kuching is a legitimate weekend travel destination that needs no justification especially if you love Sarawak Kolo Mee like myself! Bali at RM298 is the Zone 3 equivalent and the destination pretty much speaks for itself.
Then there's Bangkok, which belongs in a category of its own. At RM500 per Elite Point in Business Class, it's the clearest example of why the hotel-adjusted framework changes the decision entirely. Economy to Bangkok produces a RM700 CPEP. Business produces RM500. You get more Elite Points, a better product, and a lower cost per point.
That is what the full 17-route arbitrage list should change about how you plan your qualification trips. In the old framework, Business Class was occasionally worth considering on two routes. In the hotel-adjusted framework, it is the clearly correct choice across a broad spread of popular destinations.
For a reader targeting 140 Elite Points across four or five return trips, routing three of those as Business Class to Bangkok, Mumbai, and Jakarta generates more Elite Points per trip at a lower per-Elite-Point cost than the Economy equivalent on each of those routes. The cabin upgrade is not always an indulgence. It can be the more efficient path.
The routes to avoid are basically top-tier travel destinations, and it makes sense that the ticket prices are inflated. Hong Kong, Tokyo, and Osaka are great destinations that produce poor CPEP in either cabin. The fares and hotel markets both work against you. As such, if you're travelling here often, that's great. Otherwise, don't go out of your way to earn Elite Points just by flying to these specific destinations.
Zone 2 Economy to Bangkok, Ho Chi Minh, and Phnom Penh should equally be retired from any Platinum acquisition plan, as the data favours Business Class on these trips. Flying them in Economy costs more per Elite Point, earns fewer points per trip, and is a worse experience on top of that.
Tier Carry Forward: Do Not Ignore This
Tier Carry Forward is useful, especially under the AmBank-adjusted threshold.
If you earn more Elite Points than required for your tier, excess Elite Points can be carried forward into the next calendar year, subject to the applicable cap.
For AmBank Enrich Visa principal cardholders, carry-forward is capped at 50% of the reduced requalification requirement. For Platinum, that means a maximum carry-forward of 49 Elite Points. I'd suggest verifying this against the current Enrich terms and conditions before relying on it, as programme rules in this area can change without prominent announcement.
This matters because over-qualifying is not automatically wasted. For example, an AmBank cardholder who earns 120 Elite Points clears the 98 Elite Point Platinum threshold and may carry forward eligible excess Elite Points into the next cycle, subject to the cap.
Lounge Access Should Be Part of the Strategy
Enrich Platinum status is not permanent. It expires if you do not maintain it. Likewise, the AmBank Enrich credit cards’ 30% fast-track benefit may not survive indefinitely in its current form.
That makes actual status utilisation important. If you fly frequently enough to earn Enrich Platinum, you spend meaningful time in airports. Lounge access, terminal quality, transit comfort and airport friction matter.
A Japan trip with a decent departure experience, good lounge access, a tolerable onboard product and an enjoyable destination is very different from a random turnaround where the only memorable feature is airport carpet.
Credit cards matter before you earn Platinum because they make the qualification journey more comfortable. Oneworld Emerald matters after you earn Platinum because it unlocks better partner lounges.
As such, do not overvalue Malaysia Airlines’ own lounges. The Golden Lounge experience remains inconsistent, crowded and often underwhelming for a top-tier elite proposition, especially when Oneworld Emerald status grants you access to some of the best lounges in the world.
As a matter of fact, your journey towards Platinum via Gold (Oneworld Sapphire) already creates significant opportunities to visit lounges worldwide.
Earning Elite Points via Oneworld Carriers
This guide focuses on Malaysia Airlines-operated routes for intentional reasons. Partner earning via flying Oneworld carriers is possible, but inconsistent enough to make it unreliable as a systematic qualification tool.
Cathay Pacific and Japan Airlines are the two partners most relevant to Malaysian frequent flyers. Both serve KUL and earn Enrich Elite Points under the same zone-and-cabin table.
The problem is that discounted fare classes on both carriers frequently sit in booking buckets that earn zero Enrich Elite Points, and this is not always transparent before payment particularly when booking through OTAs or during promotional sales.
British Airways, Qantas, and Qatar Airways follow similar patterns. The rules differ by carrier, booking channel, and fare family, and verifying eligibility requires checking against each airline's specific fare class table before committing.
If you already fly Cathay Pacific or Japan Airlines for genuine travel, check fare class eligibility before booking and treat any Elite Points earned as a bonus rather than a planning assumption. Do not build a qualification strategy around partner earning unless you have verified specific fare class eligibility for a specific route.
A dedicated partner route article is still on the roadmap and given my workload I'll have to deprioritize it for now, but let me know if you want it published anyway.
Final Thoughts
The 2026 Enrich Platinum qualification game is harder, but more rational. Malaysia Airlines raises the Platinum threshold aggressively, but also rewards longer routes and premium cabins more clearly. The program is shifting away from low-value short-haul grinding and toward higher-value flying.
The AmBank Enrich Visa Platinum remains the single most important tool because it reduces the Platinum threshold from 140 Elite Points to 98 Elite Points, but do not misunderstand the strategy. Use AmBank for the fast-track but do not use AmBank as your main spending card.
Use the CIMB Travel World Elite, UOB PRVI Miles Elite, or Standard Chartered Beyond Visa Infinite for flight and travel spend where appropriate.
Most importantly, do not fly purely for the sake of flying. Enrich Platinum remains one of the most compelling top-tier statuses available to Malaysian travellers because of Oneworld Emerald. Malaysia Airlines may continue to test my patience as an airline, but Enrich as a loyalty program is becoming increasingly sophisticated.
That is the strange duality of this entire situation. The airline can be frustrating. The loyalty program can be surprisingly smart.
So if you are going to chase Enrich Platinum in 2026, do it properly.
Do not book ineligible fares, use the wrong credit card, or blindly chase the lowest CPEP. Most importantly, do not ignore the difference between airfare efficiency and real trip quality.
Treat status as a byproduct of intelligent travel. That is the real strategy. And in 2026, it is the only strategy that makes sense.
Hey folks, just want to say thanks for the kind comments and I'll definitely be working on the Oneworld chart when I have the time!
Very detailed guide. Thanks for putting this together, Kingsley. Hope you'll consider doing the oneworld one as well!
I think the sweet spot for one world earnings in economy is also in the medium haul flights. I’ve used Qatar to fly from KUL to LHR via DOH and it’s cheaper and more points than flying direct with MAS. You also get better lounges and flight experience.
What a guide! Thank you. I stay with AY ^^
My Enrich Platinum status saves me RM1000s a year on personal long haul European trip for Extra Legroom Economy seats with Qatar / Oman Air. This is actual cash saving that I would have otherwise expended.
~RM500 x 2 legs x 2 directions x 2 pax
Also many times I'd have bought (at companies expensive) Extra Legroom seats on MAS flights for those mid/long hauls, again representing RM1000s of saving.